7 Desana and the refutation of the theses proposed by Father Coppo and then by Giovanni Aldo di Ricaldone I now report a large part of the explanations, reasoning and documentary material that prompted Senator Desana1 to refute the etymological and philological research of Giovanni Aldo di Ricaldone and, before him, of Father Coppo. There is no doubt that in addition to the difkculty of tracing ancient nominal clarity, Desana relies on his arguments by referring, in a specikc and decisive manner, to the way of naming grapes by winemaLers and the people who lived in those lands, as Demaria and :eardi testiked in their studyq the words said, their synonymic use, commercial agreements, the papers found served, knally, to build a reference frameworL in which the Barbesine represented, either as a better Nuality variant or as eNuivalents, Grignolino. Origins of a name In 9ovember 16'' Desana gave a conference at the Rotary Club of Casale which was then reported in article form both in La Provincia di Alessandria and in Il Coltivatore e Giornale Vinicolo Italiano di Casale. The conference started from DalmassoPs 1. The debate reports what Maolo Desana expressed in Storie di vini e di uomini, in Gabriele Serrafero, Maolo Desana, Gente e vini del Monferrato, Rotary Club Casale 7onferrato, Casale 7onferrato, 1651, pp. 68-12E
7. Desana and the refutation of the theses proposed by Father Coppo and then by Giovanni Aldo di Ricaldone